xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clay Leeds <the.webmaes...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1360665 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/ test/java/org/apache/fop/intermediate/ test/java/org/apache/fop/layoutengine/
Date Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:24:46 GMT
OT, but I've made some progress on the CMS. I now have dynamic content working (separate header
and sidenav for FOP, Batik & XGC). 

More relevant comments below...

On Jul 18, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Vincent Hennebert <vhennebert@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alexios,
> thanks for you input.
> On 18/07/12 01:05, Alexios Giotis wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>> On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> It improves documentation. For example, I frequently execute "svn annotate", read
the usually brief commit message and then refer to the bug for more info (and context in my
case). I don't like the fact that I have to rely to another system, but it helps, especially
for old change sets.
> Well, the problem is probably not the lack of a BTS here, it’s probably
> the commit message that shouldn’t be that short. And a longer
> description should be in status.xml anyway. Also, I find the list of
> comments that usually appears in Bugzilla entries confusing more than
> anything else. You have to wander through the comments to understand
> what is going on.

Perhaps, if something significant changes, the OP or someone for a bug can update the description
(e. g., w 'UPDATE:') where they pick out the meat of a discussion and stik it in the Description

> That said, if a bug affects the rendering part of FOP which is not
> really unit-testable at the moment, the commit is unlikely to contain
> any test, so it helps to be able to retrieve an example output on
> Bugzilla. And I suppose that for the sake of consistency, the same
> should be done for layout bugs.

I would expect an example attachment of PDFs or Afp, Ps, etc. for layout bugs. 

> Also, I’m just remembering that we will at some point switch to the
> Apache CMS to generate the website and that the status.xml logic may not
> be ported there. That’s probably the biggest factor that would push me
> to switch to Bugzilla actually.

My hope is that the BTS system can output a file for us. I understand that HTML files can
be inserted, unchanged by the CMS. I plan on something like this for Compliance.html. 

> <snip/>

View raw message