xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Levinson <Jonathan.Levin...@intersystems.com>
Subject RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52513] [PATCH] Moving FOUserAgent to the constructor of Renderers
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:46:01 GMT
Hi Mehdi,

I'm trying to assess the impact on our code if any.

It seems we just use the FOPFactory and don't directly construct a renderer so this change
will have *no* impact on our code.

The factory to get a new Fop already has foUserAgent in the constructor, so nothing has changed
in this regard, for example:

            Fop fop = fopFactory.newFop(MimeConstants.MIME_PDF, foUserAgent, out);

I've examined your diff, and unless I'm mistaken nothing in it impacts our client-server that
accepts requests for FOP rendering via TCP/IP.

You aren't changing how the FOPFactory is instantiated or how the FOP factory is used to instantiate

I can't assess the impact on other people's applications but the impact on our application
seems non-existent.

Best Regards,
Jonathan Levinson
Senior Software Developer
Object Group
+1 617-621-0600

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla@apache.org [mailto:bugzilla@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 6:19 AM
> To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52513] [PATCH] Moving FOUserAgent to the
> constructor of Renderers
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513
> --- Comment #2 from Mehdi Houshmand <med1985@gmail.com> 2012-01-25
> 11:19:00 UTC --- Since there doesn't seem to be any strong opposition to this
> change, I'll start a lazy consensus (i.e. apply the patch in 72hrs henceforth) to
> allow people to discuss any objections they may have.
> --
> Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the
> bug.

View raw message