xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50763] New: [PATCH] Size basic-link areas according to descendant areas
Date Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:11:46 GMT

Can you please review the attached patch and let me know what you think.
If we decide to apply it to Trunk we are going to deliberately break the
XSL-FO 1.1 Recommendation. I believe it’s something we want to do
anyway, as I honestly think there’s a bug in the Recommendation on this
regard; At least as far as basic-link is concerned.

I’ll launch a vote in a few days for the integration of this feature to


On 11/02/11 15:57, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
>            Summary: [PATCH] Size basic-link areas according to descendant
>                     areas
>            Product: Fop
>            Version: all
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: All
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P2
>          Component: page-master/layout
>         AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>         ReportedBy: vhennebert@gmail.com
> Created an attachment (id=26641)
>  --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26641)
> Patch implementing the change
> The descendants of an inline-area are not taken into account when computing the
> height of the inline-area.
> The main real-life scenario is the following: when an image is surrounded by a
> basic-link element, only a small part of it becomes active ("clickable"), not
> the whole image.
> See full discussion there:
> http://markmail.org/thread/d2a5p4dufipdgfp2
> Bug report at W3C: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11672
> The attached patch breaks the XSL-FO 1.1 Recommendation and sizes basic-link
> areas according to their descendant areas. More precisely, the
> block-progression-dimension of the content-rectangles of basic-link areas is
> computed so as to encompass all the allocation-rectangles of the descendant
> areas.

View raw message