xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44412] Missing border-after when break-after set on a block
Date Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:41:29 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412


Jeremias Maerki <jeremias@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #5 from Jeremias Maerki <jeremias@apache.org>  2008-03-14 07:41:28 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Created an attachment (id=21531)
 --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21531) [details] [details]
> > Missing border-before when break-before set
> > 
> > Another problematic situation: when break-before is set on a block, the before
> > border of the enclosing block is not rendered.
> 
> I'm not sure this is really wrong. Unexpected maybe. The spec says that
> fo:block produces one or more areas. Now if the first child of this block
> causes a break-before the block should probably still create an area on the
> (current) page before the break (but with bpd=0), i.e. with only before
> borders. This doesn't happen now. I'll go through the spec again just to be
> sure. But at any rate, I believe the bug here is not that the border before is
> missing on the second page, but that it's missing on the first.
> 

I've gone through the spec again and believe my initial analysis was correct.
I've fixed the problem accordingly.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=637119&view=rev


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Mime
View raw message