xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41272] - Memory problem in 0.93
Date Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:02:28 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41272>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41272





------- Additional Comments From a_l.delmelle@pandora.be  2007-01-03 12:02 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I have constantly read statements, which claimed Trunk was able to process much
> larger documents, which I also interpreted as a much smaller memory food print.

It's not that simple, I'm afraid... 
Although most reports we have received so far indeed indicate that 0.9x is generally faster
and uses less 
resources, this greatly depends greatly on the structure of your FO document. 
The use of multiple, relatively small page-sequences is a key factor here. If a document is
divided nicely 
into sequences of 10 pages maximum, then the total number of pages becomes irrelevant. We've
had 
feedback from users processing 12000 paged documents without complaints (although the heap
still 
grows to about 0.5GB).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Mime
View raw message