xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Bowditch <bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: fop-0.92.beta: Thread safety issues with FOP instance construction
Date Mon, 15 May 2006 09:51:53 GMT
Jeremias Maerki wrote:

> I'm sure everyone has seen this thread on fop-users. Any particular
> preferences on one of the two options I listed below? The first will
> require coordination with Batik as they are supposed to migrate to that
> class and it's basically their version. We used a modified version of
> theirs. The second is probably cleaner but since the change is
> backwards-incompatible for any ElementMapping implementation (Barcode4J,
> for example), this is not to be taken lightly. I think the first is
> easier, should not have any side-effects but feels more like patchwork.

I prefer the first approach. I don't like the idea of backwards 
incompatible changes for Extension classes.

Chris



Mime
View raw message