xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clay Leeds <webmaes...@mac.com>
Subject Re: Combine FOP & PDFBox efforts?
Date Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:27:17 GMT
I spent a little time on the Apache Licensing page, and didn't find  
anywhere that said it was compatible (I'm not saying it isn't  
compatible, just that I didn't see anything that said it was... in  
the 5 minutes I looked). As for the rest of the licensing stuff, I  
don't know. But the answer may be on the Apache Licensing page[3]  

In any case, I suspect other FOP-dev codies will have more to say  
about the whole prospect of working together. I just thought I'd get  
the ball rolling a bit.


On Mar 9, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Ben Litchfield wrote:
> Hi Clay,
> I am glad to hear this sounds like a possibility.
> PDFBox is currently licensed under the BSD license.  I did not  
> initially envision a change in licensing, but I am open to  
> possibilities if necessary.  Is there a reason it would need to  
> change?
> It is my understanding that Apache projects can utilize projects  
> that are BSD licensed.  Is it possible for the existing FOP pdf  
> classes to become part of PDFBox under the BSD license?
> Ben
> Clay Leeds wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 2006, at 12:43 PM, Ben Litchfield wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> I am the main developer of PDFBox, an open source(BSD) PDF library.
>>> FOP contains PDF library functionality(specifically classes in
>>> org.apache.fop.pdf.*) and PDFBox is a PDF library.  Because they do
>>> very similar things they contain a lot of overlapping code, but  
>>> the pdf
>>> package in FOP has some features that PDFBox does not and PDFBox has
>>> some features that the FOP pdf package does not.
>>> I propose that classes in FOP's package be 'merged' into the PDFBox
>>> library and FOP utilize PDFBox for PDF functionality.
>> <snip>
>>> Ben Litchfield
>>> http://www.pdfbox.org/
>> Thank you for your interest, Ben. Although I don't speak for  
>> everyone, it does look intriguing to me. You may want to clarify  
>> how you envision PDFBox will be licensed (would this be a software  
>> license grant[1]?). I don't know the details on the BSD license.  
>> Also, I assume you would provide a software license grant and fill  
>> out a CLA[2].
>> [1]
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
>> [2]
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas


Clay Leeds

My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
-- HH Dalai Lama of Tibet

View raw message