xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Mazza <glenma...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: svg doc
Date Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:45:50 GMT
It would seem cleaner to have this (very well-written)
information on the Batik site--so all Batik users can
be aware of it--and add a Forrest <note> on the FOP
SVG page letting them know (1) you don't need to use
FOP for SVG->PDF generation, and (2) referring them to
this information on the Batik site.  (This may also
have the added benefit of routing User ML questions on
SVG transcoders properly to the Batik site.)


--- Jeremias Maerki <dev.jeremias@greenmail.ch> wrote:
> Back from the beach... :-)
> I do. Keiron probably, too. This is about the
> transcoders (SVG->PDF,
> SVG->PostScript, SVG->EPS) that represent a very
> useful Batik extension.
> You can see it as some kind of sub-subproject of
> FOP. We can probably
> separate the Transcoder documentation from the rest
> a bit to avoid
> confusion. So a simple remove is to quite the right
> way. I'll add it to
> my todo list to write up something new if nobody
> else does it first.

Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message