xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Mazza <glenma...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: funding developers (WAS: tagged PDF)
Date Mon, 14 Apr 2003 00:07:09 GMT
>> Having an explicit list of committers on the site
>> could also help get FOP done more quickly.  The
>> current situation, where would-be FOP developers,
>> addition to working for free, must labor in
>> may be reducing the pool of top developers willing
>> work on the project.  

>I'm wonder what triggered that paragraph. Would you

Sure--by "laboring in anonymity" I'm not referring to
the non-committers or users like myself, but I was
referring to the committers (and their companies)

Looking at three of Apache's more/most successful
projects:  Apache, Tomcat, and Struts, each has a "Who
We Are" section listing the committers, their email
addresses, and some their sponsoring companies.  

for example (Apache):

This gives the committers order-of-magnitude better
recognition for their work, also their companies,
which in turn creates more sponsorship, as companies
try to outdo themselves by having the most well-known
employees.  The system works well for these projects: 
some of the best talent worldwide work on them.

But with products lacking a "Who We Are" section, 
committers/companies working on the project have to
labor in (relative) anonymity.  I was thinking this
might be limiting the pool of "top developers" (i.e.,
XML/parsing gurus who can make mincemeat out of FOP,
while drunk, in their sleep...) that FOP can lure. 


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more

To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org

View raw message