ripple-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Barham <Tim.Bar...@microsoft.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Ripple release 0.9.28 RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.28
Date Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:56:49 GMT
> I suggest we would do it similar:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ripple/KEYS

Yep, I agree. And that's the location I documented in the KEYS file too.

Thanks,

Tim
________________________________________
From: Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 7:21 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]  Ripple release 0.9.28 RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.28

Hi Tim,

you might want to see how Commons is doing it:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/README.txt?view=markup

It's also interesting how it is documented:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS

Apache Logging is doing it similar:
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/download.html

I suggest we would do it similar:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ripple/KEYS

Wdyt?

Regards,
Christian

--
  Christian Grobmeier
  http://www.grobmeier.de
  http://www.timeandbill.de

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015, at 06:08, Tim Barham wrote:
> Ross - about the KEYS file... I was wondering how that usually gets
> included. I've noticed the KEYS file is always included in the root of a
> project's Apache archive, and sometimes seems to be in version control
> and sometimes not. I've added a KEYS file to the same folder that
> contains the package and supporting files (and I'll also check it in),
> but I'm not sure that's what I should be doing. I've also now added my
> key fingerprint to my Apache account (so now it shows up in
> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/ripple.asc).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobmeier@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 7:29 PM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Ripple release 0.9.28 (Attempt 2)
>
> Hi
>
> I am very sorry for being late to the party!
>
> Tim, could you let me know where I can find the signature keys?
>
> I couldn't find BD12A00B3D7CC134. Usually we have it in some KEYS file
> somewhere and should document for users how they can verify the release.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015, at 15:07, Tim Barham wrote:
> > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.28.
> >
> >
> > Changes since the previous vote thread: this is a new package that
> > contains all source material (everything in the git repo), and no
> > build output.
> >
> >
> > The package you are voting on is available for review at
> > http://1drv.ms/1BAKsBJ. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
> >      incubator-ripple: 0.9.28 (1d95fed542)
> >
> >
> > Since this will be an official Apache release of Ripple (our first!),
> > we must be particularly careful that it complies with all Apache
> > guidelines for an incubator release. As such, before voting +1, please
> > refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list.
> >
> >
> > If anyone has concerns that we don't meet any of these requirements,
> > please don't hesitate to raise them here so we can discuss and make
> > changes if necessary.
> >
> >
> > If you do give a +1 vote, please include what steps you took in order
> > to be confident in the release.
> >
> >
> > Please also note from Ross's recent email:
> >
> >
> > > What we need is three +1 "binding" votes, in reality that means
> > > three IPMC members. Once a project graduates it means three project
> > > management committee members. However, as a mentor (therefore having
> > > a binding vote) I look to the project participants to indicate their
> > > preference and (assuming no blocking issues on an IP check) I'll
> > > always vote in support of the communities non- binding votes.
> >
> >
> > So please, even though your vote may not be binding, take some time to
> > review the release and vote!
> >
> >
> > Upon a successful vote, we will arrange for the archive to be uploaded
> > to dist/incubator/ and publish it to NPM.
> >
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * I verified build works and tests all pass
> > * I ran Apache RAT against the repo and confirmed we were ok with all
> > files reported by RAT (which I'll be adding to RAT exceptions when I
> > add tools to run RAT automatically).
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message