portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott T Weaver (JIRA)" <jetspeed-...@portals.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JS2-318) Upgrading to Torque 3.2-rc1 and to OJB 1.0.3
Date Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:43:35 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-318?page=comments#action_12317338 ] 

Scott T Weaver commented on JS2-318:

Can we PLEASE get a list of all tables/columns that will change.  I have multiple production
instances that I will need to change by hand as re-creating them is not an option.

> Upgrading to Torque 3.2-rc1 and to OJB 1.0.3
> --------------------------------------------
>          Key: JS2-318
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-318
>      Project: Jetspeed 2
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Persistence and DAO
>     Versions: 2.0-M4
>     Reporter: David Le Strat
>     Assignee: David Le Strat
>      Fix For: 2.0-M4

> I have been doing some tests and I think we should upgrade Torque (to 3.2-rc1) and OJB
(to 1.0.3) for the following reasons:
> 1. Torque:  Now supports derby for SQL generation.  Also, issues with cascading delete
and HSQL have been fixed.  This will address http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-227.
> 2. OJB: Quite a few bugs fixed. Also, I noticed a couple of weird behaviors with the
current version:
> As I mentioned in a previous email:
> - AbstractRegistryTest: the assertion on line 198 (assertNotNull("Web app did NOT persist
its description", webApp.getDescription(Locale.FRENCH));) works no matter what locale is passed.
I tried Locale.getDefault(), as well as Locale.FRENCH and it does not seem to matter.  With
1.0.3, the assertion only works for Locale.FRENCH.  Which the right correct behavior.
> - TestUserInfoManager: When testing with ExtendedPortletMetadata, I do not quite understand
> it ever worked without calling updatePortletApplication on the registry.  With OJB 1.0.3,
you need to update the portlet application with the new loaded metadata for the test to pass.
 Just seem to make sense 
> to me.
> I have applied the changes locally, I re-ran all the tests and everything is working,
including the deployed application.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org

View raw message