mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jie Yu <yujie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 64726: Renamed operation protos for consistency.
Date Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:05:57 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/#review194261
-----------------------------------------------------------




include/mesos/mesos.proto
Line 2279 (original), 2277 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/#comment272985>

    Should we call this `uuid` because the context is Operation?



include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto
Line 252 (original), 252 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/#comment272987>

    ACKNOWLEDGE_OPERATION_STATUS?



include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto
Line 406 (original), 406 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/#comment272986>

    Should that be `ACKNOWLEDGE_OPERATION_STATUS` to be consistently with RP api?



include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto
Lines 491-492 (original), 492 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/#comment272988>

    Ditto



src/messages/messages.proto
Line 411 (original), 411 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/#comment272989>

    Either we use OperationUpdateXXX or OperationStatusXXX, but let's be consistent.


- Jie Yu


On Dec. 20, 2017, 2:53 a.m., Gaston Kleiman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 20, 2017, 2:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Chun-Hung Hsiao, Greg Mann, Jie Yu, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Renamed operation protos for consistency.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto bf2ec8f4630fb32a36a1a0d49de23e0ddc0c6c84 
>   include/mesos/resource_provider/resource_provider.proto 4534049bce3948f20a00cd704f09173077c8cdf8

>   include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto a7907e2c0a8e0f23690179b9e334377c4acc9068 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 9e240c0756ee9747f1ef226db963dfc6ab5c699a 
>   include/mesos/v1/resource_provider/resource_provider.proto beb9f1734b8d916150ecc6ed1c5b86f0672cd941

>   include/mesos/v1/scheduler/scheduler.proto e115bca04646133cfa3bbd6e7ba190b69f807f2b

>   src/messages/messages.proto baefbe97b57d28d70d8952604d12cdc543eaced4 
>   src/resource_provider/state.proto e3362a958851cefc175ee9ba0563da2b8bf8bb08 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64726/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaston Kleiman
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message