mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos Reviewbot <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 62446: Additional check when building with java bindings enabled.
Date Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:42:26 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62446/#review185916
-----------------------------------------------------------



Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [62446, 62445, 62444, 62161, 62160]

Failed command: python support/apply-reviews.py -n -r 62161

Error:
2017-09-21 19:42:25 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/62161/diff/raw/ [1724/1724] -> "62161.patch"
[1]
error: missing binary patch data for '3rdparty/boost-1.65.0.tar.gz'
error: binary patch does not apply to '3rdparty/boost-1.65.0.tar.gz'
error: 3rdparty/boost-1.65.0.tar.gz: patch does not apply

Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Reviewbot/19500/console

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Sept. 20, 2017, 5:07 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62446/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 20, 2017, 5:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Check whether the versions of libprotobuf used by mesos
> and by maven are different, which will lead to a
> compile-time failure that may be hard to understand
> for those not familiar with maven.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configure.ac 92bc1aa5f9604e3b2b678225a57622cd2eb8679a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62446/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benno Evers
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message