lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shad Storhaug <>
Subject RE: [GitHub] [lucenenet] NightOwl888 opened a new pull request #442: Reviewed Reverse() calls
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2021 16:43:46 GMT

I saw a couple of your emails, and they were addressed to, so I ignored
them because I assumed you wanted to be unsubscribed from that list, not
(you did not specify which one). Do note that each mailing list is separate, may be moderated
by different people, and you have to subscribe/unsubscribe from each separately.

That being said, Atri is correct. Mailing lists are a self-help thing and there is no reason
to get a human involved. For this list:

1. Send an email to
2. Reply to the response (check your SPAM folder if necessary) to complete the handshake

If you don't reply to the response, you will NOT be unsubscribed.

You will have to repeat this for if you also want to be
unsubscribed from that list or follow the <listname>-unsubscribe@<projectname>
pattern for any other lists you wish to unsubscribe from.

If you are still having issues getting unsubscribed from, let us
know. But if you are having trouble with other mailing lists, I suggest emailing
to explain the situation (do note you have to subscribe to that list first before emailing
to it to receive replies).

Shad Storhaug
Project Chairperson - Apache Lucene.NET

-----Original Message-----
From: Atri Sharma <> 
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2021 10:47 PM
To: Yogi Valani <>
Cc: dev <>;
Subject: Re: [GitHub] [lucenenet] NightOwl888 opened a new pull request #442: Reviewed Reverse()

This page clearly states the process to subscribe (and unsubscribe) from the list.


On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 9:05 PM Yogi Valani <> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have repeatedly asked to be removed from this mailing list. This 
> mailing list is in violation of UK Marketing and Advertising laws ( 
> But can someone please remove my mail address from the list;
and update all future mails sent to have an unsubscribe link in the emails sent.
> Regards
> Yogi
> NB:  I do understand this is an open source project and benefits to the IT community
as a whole. By referring to the law, this is in no way is this a threat (direct or implied)
of legal action.
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at 12:40, GitBox <> wrote:
>> NightOwl888 opened a new pull request #442:
>> URL:
>>    Since `Reverse()` on collections is an expensive operation, this review is just
to ensure we aren't using it unnecessarily.
>>    There was one instances in `Lucene.Net.Suggest` where using `Stack<T>` could
be used instead of reversing the output, and one instance where sorting the output was completely
unnecessary. In the latter case, using `JCG.HashSet<T>` has already solved the test
failures because its `Equals()` method respects set equality by default.
>>    Also, an unnecessary lock was removed that had been added during the port.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
>> To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL 
>> above to go to the specific comment.
>> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:


Apache Concerted
View raw message