lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <>
Subject RE: FastVectorHilighter
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:02:51 GMT
Absolutely, we should fix things they haven't fixed or aren't sure about yet. These can be
things that differentiate .Net so we aren't just a port of Java lucene, but adding extra value.

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Zachary Gramana
Sent: 8/28/2012 7:44 AM
Cc:; Gian Maria Ricci
Subject: Re: FastVectorHilighter

I'm sure they would be happy for us to send them patches that resolve open items, if we can
back port them to Java.

On Aug 28, 2012, at 5:22 AM, Simon Svensson <> wrote:

> It's not yet fixed in Lucene, and this makes me wonder; do we "fix" things that have
yet to be fixed in Lucene?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message