lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues
Date Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:27:58 GMT
Yes

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Christopher Currens
Sent: 8/8/2012 4:22 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues

Oh, did you do that so we'd have a branch to do bug fixes?  I had forgotten
about that.

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

> I just created 3.0.3 last weekend - it should be incredibly up to date.
> Anything in trunk should be there
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Christopher Currens
> Sent: 8/8/2012 1:35 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues
>
> Thanks for the feedback.  Let us know if you run into any more
> issues/concerns.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Granroth, Neal V. <
> neal.granroth@thermofisher.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes I pulled from the branch not the trunk. I apparently made the
> > incorrect assumption that it would be slightly more stable than the
> current
> > work-in-progress.
> >
> > Thanks for the quick attention and clarifications.  Especially for those
> > that rely upon the binary packages.
> >
> > - Neal
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.chris@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:21 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues
> >
> > FYI - SVN has been updated with corrected VS2010 solutions and added
> VS2012
> > directory/solution files.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Christopher Currens <
> > currens.chris@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > See inline comments.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Christopher
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Granroth, Neal V. <
> > > neal.granroth@thermofisher.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I just pulled down the 3.0.3 branch from SVN and have encountered an
> > >> initial problem with the VisualStudio solution file
> Lucene.Net.Core.sln
> > in
> > >> the VS2010 folder.
> > >>
> > >> Did you pull down the 3.0.3 branch or trunk?  Trunk is 3.0.3, I'm not
> > > even sure the 3.0.3 branch exists anymore, and if it does, it is very,
> > very
> > > out of date.
> > >
> > >
> > >> This solution will not load in VS2010, Visual Studio complains that it
> > >> was created with a newer version.
> > >> Opening the solution file in notepad reveals that it was created with
> > >> VS2012 (a not yet released product)
> > >>
> > >> They are supposed to be VS2010, if the pathing didn't give it away.  I
> > > believe it was my fault, as I usually will change them back to VS2010
> > > manually, but forgot to do that while I was adding .NET 3.5 support
> back
> > > in.  In order to automate the change, I needed to use the RC and forgot
> > to
> > > change the solution files back. As an aside, VS2012 solution files are
> > (or
> > > at least supposed to be) backwards compatible with VS2010.  On my
> laptop,
> > > which only has VS2010 SP1, they open and compile just fine.
> > >
> > >
> > >> It would be very helpful if those maintaining the source distribution
> > >> limit themselves to released development tools only.
> > >>
> > >> Since that's our normal policy, this isn't really an issue.
> > >
> > >
> > >> It also make me wonder of the viability of any binary distributions;
> > they
> > >> certainly should not have been created with VS2012RC
> > >>
> > >
> > > Prescott used VS2010 to make the binary, so I don't think you need to
> > > worry about this.
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> - Neal G.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message