lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Date Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:56:58 GMT
Actively working on it as we speak, should be ready by Tuesday. Up to you :)

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
> Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it
> to the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at
> finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't want to
> hold off 3.0.3 that much longer
>
> > Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> > From: zgramana@gmail.com
> > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:18:17 -0400
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > Glad to hear it.
> >
> > FWIW, I've deployed the Spatial contrib on client projects against
> 2.9.4.1, which would break without the Geometry namespace. I'm doubt I'm
> the only one.
> >
> > I would encourage not releasing the 3.0.3 Contribs.Spatial until that is
> included. I think most people using the stable NuGet feed would expect
> 3.0.3 to be complete with respect to Java Lucene. It may take people quite
> a bit of work to get their code working again in 3.0.3 with just the
> .NETification changes alone. If people find that, after all that work, they
> now have to wait for a maintenance release, there could be some real grumpy
> coders out there taking to social media with pitch forks in hand.
> >
> > It sounded like he was done with 4.0 and just back porting to 3.5. I
> would be happy to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it could help.
> >
> >
> > On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens <
> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on
> > > getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that
> > > this is the Geometry namespace).  I'm unsure if it will make it into
> > > the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a
> > > maintenance release shortly after.
> >
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message