lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Date Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:31:28 GMT
Chris & Itamar great turn around today on those fixes. I've uploaded 3.0.3RC2 to nuget
for contrib (and lucene.net was there as of yesterday). ~P  > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> Subject: RE: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:10:06 -0700
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> CC: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> 
> there are issues with the new mailing lists atm. Infra is aware and reopened our jira
ticket for it
> 
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Christopher Currens
> Sent: 8/23/2012 2:56 PM
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Cc: Prescott Nasser; lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> 
> Are either of you getting delivery failures to dev@lucenenet.apache.org?
>  This happened earlier this week and is my second one today.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Christopher Currens <
> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Okay, I'm done.  For now, it is its own nuget package, but I think I would
> > like to eventually (maybe even before the release, if this is just another
> > RC today), get them as separate packages.  It is pretty annoying to pull in
> > the entire contrib library for 1-2 libraries I actually want.  The build
> > system need some maintenance for a while now, mostly just because as it's
> > evolved there have been some things I've noticed that are left over, mostly
> > just some duplicate symbols, which really just aesthetic since they don't
> > affect the build process at all.
> >
> > Prescott, I would double check my work on the spatial.nts nuspec in
> > particular, and just make sure I got the dependencies right.  I know the
> > IDs and versions are, but I have no idea how to confirm or test
> > packages...making sure the dependencies resolve.  Idk if there's a tool of
> > sorts or a command.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Christopher
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:
> >
> >> My point exactly.
> >>
> >> Especially with the NTS integration we have for Spatial, I can't really
> >> provide you with 4 additional assemblies which are required for the NTS
> >> version of the spatial contrib only because you wanted the FVH
> >>
> >> Quick fix would be to have the non-NTS version in the one contrib-ball,
> >> and
> >> issue a special nuget package for the NTS version, with nuget dependencies
> >> and all
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Christopher Currens <
> >> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > There seemed to be a leaning[1] toward[2] a single[3] package[4] for
> >> > contrib.  I don't remember that discussion at all, which means I
> >> probably
> >> > didn't read it. :X   There are some good points raised in for both
> >> sides.
> >> >  I'm still on the side of a separate package for each, simply because
> >> if I
> >> > want the FVH, I really only want the FVH, not spatial, regex queries,
> >> etc.
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/201109.mbox/browser
> >> > [2]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/201109.mbox/%3C006701cc78b0%2486165710%2492430530%24%40com%3E
> >> > [3]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/201109.mbox/%3C3FCEA726F7253C4FAC829227E83E051405BE2D0398%40USPHO-MXVS05.amer.thermo.com%3E
> >> > [4]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/201112.mbox/%3CCA+QKZbWH26b7Oq0TsK5qgFSF1hndL9AKrQZ6s7nhxze3oxKGgg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Prescott Nasser <
> >> geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >  I think that we decided that was easier at the time, there was
> >> > > definitely a conversation about it. Ill try to search the dev logs.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Sent from my Windows Phone
> >> > >  ------------------------------
> >> > > From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > Sent: 8/23/2012 11:34 AM
> >> > > To: Christopher Currens
> >> > > Cc: Prescott Nasser; lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> >> > >
> >> > >  Why do we have a single nuget package for all contribs in the first
> >> > > place?
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Christopher Currens <
> >> > > currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Yeah, the single nuget contrib package will cause problems, because
> >> > > > both Contrib.Spatial and Contrib.Spatial.NTS use the same
> >> namespace...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If we appended NTS to the namespace, then it would break the
tests,
> >> > > > because we run the same test code for both, and would then need
to
> >> > > > update all the using namespace definitions.  It seems the best
> >> > > > solution would be to have a separate nuget packaged for it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > How should I go about this?  Should I try and separate it out
(I
> >> might
> >> > > > as well do more or all of them, then)?  In theory, it should
be
> >> pretty
> >> > > > easy, except for all of the new descriptions that would have
 to be
> >> > > > written for each nuspec :/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Prescott Nasser <
> >> > geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > We have a single nuget contrib package atm.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > For the naming convention thing Chris - might as well get
that
> >> in. I
> >> > > > have a
> >> > > > > few hours window in about 4 hours to redo the nuget stuff.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Dev users - this was supposed to be a quick back and forth
but
> >> grew a
> >> > > > bit,
> >> > > > > it should have been on the dev list. My apologies.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone
> >> > > > > ________________________________
> >> > > > > From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > Sent: 8/23/2012 10:42 AM
> >> > > > > To: Christopher Currens
> >> > > > > Cc: Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > If there is a package for each contrib, let's have NTS as
another
> >> > > > package.
> >> > > > > For that package, add NetTopologySuite 1.12 and GeoAPI as
nuget
> >> > > > dependencies
> >> > > > > (I think the GeoAPI one will be derived from NTS anyway)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I think we should also release with LUCENENET-503 in
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Christopher Currens
> >> > > > > <currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Should I add the NTS spatial to the Spatial nuget package
or
> >> create a
> >> > > > > separate Spatial.NTS nuget package?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Christopher Currens
> >> > > > > <currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >> Yeah.  I'll get all that done and send out another email
when its
> >> > > > >> finished.  Should I get LUCENENET-503 in there as well,
or only
> >> put
> >> > > > >> that in trunk?  It's just a naming consistency thing.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
<
> >> > > > itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>> Cool, thanks
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Can you also handle updating the assemblies in both
trunk and
> >> > branch?
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Christopher Currens
> >> > > > >>> <currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> It took me an embarrassingly long time to figure
out how to
> >> > properly
> >> > > > >>>> push to github (I have no idea why, I've done
it in the past!),
> >> > but
> >> > > I
> >> > > > >>>> made a pull request with configuration changes
to allow it to
> >> > build
> >> > > in
> >> > > > >>>> .NET 3.5 and 4.0.
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> Now, I'm going to push changes to the SVN that
changes all of
> >> the
> >> > > > >>>> assembly metadata from 2.9.x to 3.0.3
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Christopher
Currens
> >> > > > >>>> <currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> > If you want to target multiple frameworks,
each framework
> >> > version
> >> > > > has
> >> > > > >>>> > to live in each configuration property
group.  You have
> >> > > > >>>> > TargetFrameworkVersion v3.5 set in the
*35 configurations,
> >> but
> >> > > > there's
> >> > > > >>>> > a global v4.0 that's overriding it.
> >> > > > >>>> >
> >> > > > >>>> > I actually have changes that fix this,
I just have to figure
> >> out
> >> > > how
> >> > > > >>>> > to use git properly. :)
> >> > > > >>>> >
> >> > > > >>>> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Itamar
Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > >>>> > <itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > >>>> > wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >> Pushed my latest changes to github.
Some 3.5 compilation
> >> > setting
> >> > > > must
> >> > > > >>>> >> be off
> >> > > > >>>> >> - can you have a look?
> >> > > > >>>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >> Maybe we should update all contrib
metadata to say 3.0.3?
> >> > > > >>>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Christopher
Currens
> >> > > > >>>> >> <currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> The binaries in lib/spatial4n/NET35
are actually targeting
> >> the
> >> > > 4.0
> >> > > > >>>> >>> runtime, so Visual Studio and MSBuild
refuses to compile
> >> them,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> saying
> >> > > > >>>> >>> it can't find those types.  I pushed
.NET 35 binaries to
> >> the
> >> > > 3.0.3
> >> > > > >>>> >>> branch, and I just noticed that
you updated the binaries in
> >> > > Trunk
> >> > > > >>>> >>> about a half hour ago.  Right now
Trunk fails for me and
> >> 3.0.3
> >> > > > >>>> >>> succeeds.  I'm assuming those include
changes to the
> >> binaries
> >> > in
> >> > > > >>>> >>> trunk
> >> > > > >>>> >>> aren't present in the Spatial4n
repo on github, so I wasn't
> >> > > going
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > >>>> >>> try and rebuild them for the 3.0.3
branch.
> >> > > > >>>> >>>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> There's another issue I found while
messing around with
> >> this
> >> > (I
> >> > > > >>>> >>> actually was starting work on LUCENENET-503
when I ran into
> >> > > this),
> >> > > > >>>> >>> we
> >> > > > >>>> >>> have a lot of contrib assemblies
with old assembly
> >> metadata.
> >> > > Some
> >> > > > >>>> >>> contrib assemblies are marked 2.9.2,
some 2.9.4, and a few
> >> > > others.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> I'll be pushing those changes to
the 3.0.3 branch, which
> >> > should
> >> > > be
> >> > > > >>>> >>> fine considering they're just metadata
changes.
> >> > > > >>>> >>>
> >> > > > >>>> >>>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:51 AM,
Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > >>>> >>> <itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > I just committed a few changes
that should resolve some
> >> of
> >> > > those
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > issues.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > .NET 4.0 compilation goes
smooth, but I can't get 3.5 to
> >> > > > properly
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > compile
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > and test, not sure why. Will
appreciate it if you can
> >> have a
> >> > > > look.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > Chris just pushed some changes
to the branch, not sure if
> >> > they
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > related?
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > CC'ed him
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > No problem re the lib folder.
If the contribs are split
> >> up
> >> > and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > each
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > will
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > have its own nuget package
we can have 2 for spatial -
> >> one
> >> > > > regular
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > the
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > other NTS, while the latter
will depend on GeoAPI and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > NetTopologySuite
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > to
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > automate this a bit.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > I can also put Spatial4n on
nuget, but I think it's a bit
> >> > too
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > early
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > for
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > that
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > Any way, I'm good with releasing
it now
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:43
PM, Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> > wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Sorry, wasn't quite clear.
Two things.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> First the project didn't
reference the lib/spatial4n
> >> stuff
> >> > > so I
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> included
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> those references - but
I wanted to confirm with you that
> >> > that
> >> > > > was
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> right. -
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> you've confirmed that
is right.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> The second issue is that
the lib folder is we cannot
> >> > > > distribute,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> nor
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> can
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> we distribute any files
that we don't have source code
> >> for
> >> > in
> >> > > > our
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> svn.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> So as
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> it stands, I could compile
the spatial project, but I
> >> when
> >> > I
> >> > > > put
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> the
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> nuget
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> package up, I will have
to add spatial4n as a
> >> dependency.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> This isn't a problem,
I just wanted to make sure it was
> >> > clear
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> that's
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> your intention
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Sent from my Windows Phone
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ________________________________
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Sent: 8/23/2012 2:20 AM
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> To: Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release
Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> I'm not sure I'm following,
all the spatial4n stuff is
> >> > > already
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> committed
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> to lib/spatial4n. What
was the problem and what did you
> >> > fix?
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> The DLLs there are used
twice - Spatial4n.Core from
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Contrib.Spatial,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Spatial4n.Core.NTS + GeoAPI
+ NetTopologySuite +
> >> > > > PowerCollection
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> from
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Contrib.Spatial.NTS (the
one with polygon support
> >> > enabled). I
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> hope
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> makes sense now.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at
10:21 AM, Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Hey Itamar - I'm trying
to compile the contrib packages
> >> - I
> >> > > ran
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> into an
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> error. I solved it by
making sure to include all the
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> lib/Spatial4n
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> - does that sound right
to you? I'll have a few hours
> >> > > tomorrow
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> hopefully
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> get 3.0.3 Contrib RC2
put on nuget.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Also, any reason we didn't
include all of these .dll's
> >> in
> >> > the
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> contrib
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> folder? Are you keeping
those under a difference license
> >> > and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> don't
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> want
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> to
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> integrate them with the
Lucene.Net.Contrib.Spatial
> >> project
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> specifically?
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ~P
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ________________________________
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012
04:41:36 +0300
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release
Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> From: itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> To: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Yeah I think it is. Let's
cut another RC and see how it
> >> > goes.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Enjoy your vacation!
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at
4:25 AM, Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Good to go? I'll can merge
trunk into 3.0.3 if you can't
> >> > > easily
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> then
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> I'll reroll the packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ________________________________
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012
21:17:30 +0300
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release
Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> From: itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> To: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> yes I was
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at
8:31 PM, Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Sounds good - did you
get a bounce from
> >> > > > dev@lucenenet.apache.org?
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> I
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> think
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> they accidentally closed
the jira to set those up
> >> without
> >> > > > getting
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> them
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> setup
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ________________________________
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012
20:16:53 +0300
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Subject: Fwd: 3.0.3 Pre-Release
Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> From: itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> To: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ---------- Forwarded message
----------
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
<itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Date: Wed, Aug 22, 2012
at 8:13 PM
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release
Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Give me a couple of more
hours, I want to recheck
> >> > everything
> >> > > is
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> in
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> place,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> and then you'll have my
green light
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at
4:20 PM, Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Itamar - looks like you
e committed it all, are you
> >> > > satisfied?
> >> > > > I
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> will
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> merge changes into 3.0.3
and cut new nuget packages.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Ill be gone for two weeks
with limited email, so unless
> >> > > someone
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> else
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> wants
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> to cut RC's for the binary
and source releases and hold
> >> a
> >> > > vote,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ill
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> do
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> that
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> right when I get back
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Sent from my Windows Phone
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> ________________________________
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> From: Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Sent: 8/18/2012 2:02 PM
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> To: Lucene Developers
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Subject: RE: 3.0.3 Pre-Release
Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Alright, that's reasonable.
Shoot us an email when
> >> you've
> >> > got
> >> > > > it
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> complete,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> I will cut another lucene.net.contrib
pre-release
> >> package
> >> > for
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> nuget,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> and
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> give the community until
next weekend to vet it.
> >> >  Meanwhile -
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> Does
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> anyone
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> know how to run RAT against
the 3.0.3 branch? I'd like
> >> to
> >> > > get a
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> report
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> on
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> that so we can fix any
issues there ~P
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>  > Date: Sat, 18 Aug
2012 22:56:58 +0300
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > From: itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > Actively working
on it as we speak, should be ready by
> >> > > > Tuesday.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > Up to
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > you :)
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012
at 10:43 PM, Prescott Nasser
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > Itamar - can
you provide a status update on what
> >> work
> >> > > > you've
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > done
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > on
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > the
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > Geometry stuff?
If it's something that you're close
> >> on,
> >> > > > could
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > we
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > commit it
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > to the trunk
and 3.0.3 branch so that the community
> >> > could
> >> > > > try
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > their
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > hand at
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > finishing it?
If not, I think we should move without
> >> > it.
> >> > > I
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > don't
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > want
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > to
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > hold off 3.0.3
that much longer
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > Subject:
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > From: zgramana@gmail.com
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > Date: Wed,
15 Aug 2012 17:18:17 -0400
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > Glad to
hear it.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > FWIW, I've
deployed the Spatial contrib on client
> >> > > > projects
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > against
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > 2.9.4.1, which
would break without the Geometry
> >> > > namespace.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > I'm
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > doubt
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > I'm
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > the only one.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > I would
encourage not releasing the 3.0.3
> >> > > > Contribs.Spatial
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > until
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > that is
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > included. I
think most people using the stable NuGet
> >> > feed
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > would
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > expect
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > 3.0.3 to be
complete with respect to Java Lucene. It
> >> > may
> >> > > > take
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > people
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > quite
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > a bit of work
to get their code working again in
> >> 3.0.3
> >> > > with
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > just
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > the
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > .NETification
changes alone. If people find that,
> >> after
> >> > > all
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > that
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > work,
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > they
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > now have to
wait for a maintenance release, there
> >> could
> >> > > be
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > some
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > real
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > grumpy
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > coders out there
taking to social media with pitch
> >> > forks
> >> > > in
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > hand.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > It sounded
like he was done with 4.0 and just back
> >> > > > porting
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > to
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > 3.5. I
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > would be happy
to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it
> >> > > could
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > help.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > On Aug
15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens <
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > currens.chris@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > Itamar
said a few weeks ago he was planning on
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > getting
polygon support into the spatial module
> >> (I
> >> > am
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > assuming
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > that
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > this
is the Geometry namespace).  I'm unsure if
> >> it
> >> > > will
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > make
it
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > into
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > the
official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be
> >> > pushed
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > back
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > into
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > a
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > maintenance
release shortly after.
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >>
> >> > > > >>>> >>> >
> >> > > > >>>> >>>
> >> > > > >>>> >>
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message