lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Currens <>
Subject Re: Lets talk graduation
Date Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:08:08 GMT
I've gone back and forth on whether I think we're ready for graduation or
not.  I had always felt like we weren't because the project isn't as active
as I'd like it to be.  However, I think I've been looking at it wrong.
 We've got a good enough process and we *have* made progress.  If anything,
graduating might add an urgency to the project when things get slow, since
we'd be an official project and more would be expected.  I don't think
anybody wants the project to end up like it did last time, before we gave
it a reboot.

I'm up for starting this process, but I don't want it to take any time away
from getting 3.0.3 released.


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Benson Margulies <>wrote:

> As a mentor, it's my job argue with Itamar a bit. It's not just
> semantics. We don't incubate projects indefinitely. I think that you
> all are good to go. The transition is not very much work. Please do
> draft a resolution and conduct a vote in the community, and we can
> then take it to the incubator PMC.
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <>
> wrote:
> > IMHO, whatever brings more attention to the project, and I'm not sure
> > graduation is what this project needs right now. In the end it's just
> > semantics.
> >
> > I'd focus those efforts on getting more work done and having more
> frequent
> > releases. Hence our proposition to sponsor dev, which still stands.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I think with the addition of two new committers we've made some progress
> >> in community growth. I think we'll have 3.0.3 out the door soon - are
> there
> >> any other items we think we need to address before looking to graduate?
> >> ~P

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message