lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:13:41 GMT

That's a great question - I know a lot of people like the generics, and I don't really want
it to disappear. I'd like to keep it in parity with the trunk. But I know we also have a goal
of making Lucene.Net more .Net like (further than 2.9.4g), and I don't know how that fits
in. We are a pretty small community and I know everyone has some pretty busy schedules so
it takes us considerable time to make big progress. Trying to keep three different code bases
probably isn't the right way to go.

> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:02:03 +1100
> From:
> To:
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net 3 onwards and 2.9.4g
> I was browsing "Roadmap" emails from November in Lucene developer list. It
> remains unclear in what state Lucene 3 porting is , but my question more
> about 2.9.4g .
> Is it kind of experimental dead end variation of 2.9.4 with generics ? Am
> I right in classifying it as more .Net like 2.9.4 which is unrelated to
> roadmap Lucene 3 porting effort. 		 	   		  
View raw message