lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lombard, Scott" <slomb...@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Date Tue, 10 May 2011 18:02:50 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Howard []
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 4:05 PM
> To:;
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.9.4
> All,
> Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
> The question on the table is:
> Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the
> .Net 2.0 Framework?
> Some options are:
> [+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop
> support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more
> important
> than backwards compatibility.
> [0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches
> and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to
> include
> support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards
> compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional
> complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals.
> [-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards
> compatibility is more important than new features and performance.
> This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All
> users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast
> their
> votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev and
> user mailing lists.
> Thanks,
> Troy

This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer.  Thank you, King Industries, Inc.

View raw message