lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hans Merkl ...@hmerkl.com>
Subject Re: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List)
Date Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:46:46 GMT
That's only IF there is such a tradeoff. From what I have read IKVM is as
fast as Lucene.NET.

I agree with DIGY about not hijacking this thread. I think I have started
this.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 16:38, Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] <
casperOne@caspershouse.com> wrote:

> As a consumer (and I think that most consumers would agree), I'd have to
> disagree STRONGLY on trading off performance for ease of conversion.
>
> Lucene and Lucene.NET is predicated on performance, compromising that, IMO,
> runs contrary to the core principals of Lucene.
>
>        - Nick
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message