lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Build & CI Considerations
Date Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:41:35 GMT
Why do I forget to check against the obvious? Anyhow, I guess we can
run with what we have, though that build is not doing much. Any idea
how we get administrative access over there? Might as well try and get
it to do stuff like run the tests as well.

I think long-term, we'll need something a bit more custom, at least
for the build slave/build agent angle --- that would be where the
magic largely happens. Such as automated sharpen builds . . .


On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:29 AM, digy digy <digydigy@gmail.com> wrote:
> No. It's Rune's work.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3C4B1820F4.10802@gmail.com%3E
>
> <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev/200912.mbox/%3C4B1820F4.10802@gmail.com%3E>
> DIGY
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Glyn Darkin <glyn@darkinsystems.com>wrote:
>
>> The guys at code better run a Team City CI which has been building
>> Lucene.Net for a while
>>
>> I believe that DIGY set this up.
>>
>> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/login.html
>>
>> Glyn
>>
>>
>> On 27 Jan 2011, at 09:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>> > On 2011-01-26, Wyatt Barnett wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2) CI : oh hells yeah. My vision would be to setup something where the
>> >> automated conversion would be triggered by commits to the "stable"
>> >> branch of the java project. I think if we can construct this bit right
>> >> we can even really get down the road of automatically running all the
>> >> conversion options until we get it "right".
>> >
>> > Sounds good.  "Back to the mundane" as you said later the ASF runs a few
>> > options for CI <http://ci.apache.org/>, one of them is Hudson
>> > <https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/> which has at least one Windows slave
>> > installation (Server 2008) and is supposed to support MSBuild.  Buildbot
>> > might work as well.
>> >
>> > I'm not up to speed with the state of xbuild but adding support for it
>> > to Gump (which fills quite a different role from a traditional CI)
>> > wouldn't be too hard and give us builds on Mono - albeit 2.4 right now,
>> > this could be changed by adding the Mono PPAs to the Ubuntu servers.
>> >
>> > Stefan
>>
>> Glyn Darkin
>>
>> Darkin Systems Ltd
>> Mob: 07961815649
>> Fax: 08717145065
>> Web: www.darkinsystems.com
>>
>> Company No: 6173001
>> VAT No: 906350835
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message