# lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

##### Site index · List index
Message view
Top
From Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposal Stage: Net Idiomatic Api Version
Date Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:50:11 GMT
I agree with the suggestion to follow the MS Coding standard. It's a
good general guideline. Specifically, I'd like to follow all
guidelines put forth in the book:

Framework Design Guidelines: Conventions, Idioms, and Patterns for
Reusable .NET Libraries by Krzysztof Cwalina and Brad Abrams
http://amzn.com/0321246756

There's also a lecture that Krysztof gave that's available as a
the moment for some reason):

With regards to the specifics of the API, I think we should try to
bring together the existing forks (Lucere, Lucille, and Aimee.Net) and
attempt to merge them into a single consistent alternative API for
Lucene.Net. They all use similar but slightly different tactics to
".NETify" the codebase.

Also, significant community feedback will be necessary before we
proceed to far down that road. We'll have a lot of work ahead of us
just getting up to date releases finished for the 1:1 API port. It's
my opinion though, that these can be separate and parallel development
efforts.

I made a request of the community in the Lucere project mailing list
to respond with ideas about what an ideal .NET API would look like,
and how it would function. Specifically, I was hoping to get
pseudo-code examples of how end users would like to use Lucene. Even
something as simple as:

using(var luceneIndex = new LuceneIndex.Open("C:\foo\bar"))
{
var hitDocs = from doc in luceneIndex where
doc.Field["content"].Match("foo") select doc;
}

This represents a lot of ideas all in one little code snippet. Maybe
this isn't an ideal API, maybe it is... If we collect a bunch of code
samples from people like this, we can discuss the merits of various
ideas for the API and settle on an ideal way to present the
functionality of the library in a way that will integrate well with
the .NET 3.5/4.0 environment.

I didn't get a lot of responses in the Lucere mailing list but perhaps
the Lucene.Net community will have some ideas. We should probably
cross-post to the lucene-net-user mailing list with a request for
ideas.

Thanks,
Troy

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael Herndon <mherndon@o19s.com> wrote:
> *Net Idiomatic Api Version*
> *We should probably be looking for with this criteria is readability &
> getting people familiar with any new code base faster within their own
> Idiom.  *
> *
> *
> Starting with a proposal that we use the internal Ms coding
> for
> the idiomatic version, not to make anyone's life miserable or coding less
> enjoyable or anything.
>
> But its already documented, we can easily point to it without having to
> write up our own guidelines, and everyone who works inside of .net should be
> remotely familiar with it, meaning someone can just come in and crank out
> code.
>
> If need be, we let people work on the code base in their own style and when
> they are done working on a particular area, let them reformat it or just run
> a tool that auto formats code before each release.
>
> I know their is religious wars fought over this stuff, I don't want to
> create one.  I could be wrong about the above, but what again, the goals
> should be familiarity, comfort, creating a bigger community.
>
> Also uses of core Interfaces, Annotations, & Classes where possible.  (What
> are some of these that you would like to see other than IDisposable?)
>
> A good book to comb over with the latest edition is the  "Framework Design
> Guidelines" 2nd edition.
>
> *
> *
>
>
> --
> Michael Herndon
>


Mime
View raw message