lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Martz <>
Subject Re: Vote thread started on
Date Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:43:56 GMT
So perhaps the proposal should allow for a combination of a mostly automated baseline line-by-line
port and the explicit provision that embraces drop-in (API compliant) .NET-specific replacements
for specific classes?

- Ben

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 	Troy Howard <>
> December 30, 2010 12:39 PM
> It's my opinion that we can basically commoditize an automated port
> which will fulfill the needs of the community, and allow the project
> to, at minimum, continue to release, in a timely fashion, direct ports
> of the Java Lucene releases...
> Meanwhile we can continue the efforts represented in Lucere, Lucille,
> and Aimee.Net to create an alternative API for Lucene.Net which may or
> may not include completely re-written code, depending on the
> specifics.
> I think both concepts can co-exist in a single project and that this
> will be the best way to move forward. If you followed the Lucere
> project, you'll see that my approach with TDD and Contract Driven
> Design was intended to facilitate just such an arrangement.
> Thanks,
> Troy

View raw message