lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Garski (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-266) Putting support classes in separate files and in a separate directory
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:26:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779102#action_12779102
] 

Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-266:
------------------------------------------

+1 as well from me, after 2.9.1 is released, with it as part of the 3.0 release.

I'd also like to add that with a cleanup of the codebase and a move to 3.5, many of the SupportClass
classes could be eliminated.

> Putting  support classes in separate files and in a separate directory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-266
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Iliev Andrei
>
> I am going to add some new classes (nio support, IdentityHashMap, ...) What is the best
place to put it in? SuportClass is getting bigger and bigger.
> I think it is  time to put all support classes in separate files and in a separate directory
(ex. JavaSupport).  Any comments? 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message