lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrei Iliev (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-257) TestCheckIndex.TestDeletedDocs
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:56:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779166#action_12779166
] 

Andrei Iliev commented on LUCENENET-257:
----------------------------------------

I just asked a question (not proposed a fix): does performing a flush has (must) to start
a new segment file? If answer is yes, the test must fail. If not - we have to find a bug.

> TestCheckIndex.TestDeletedDocs 
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-257
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Andrei Iliev
>            Assignee: Digy
>
> Setting writer.SetMaxBufferedDocs(2) couse flushing buffers after adding every 2 docs.
That  results in total 10 segments in the index and failing TestDeletedDocs (test case assumes
that there is only 1 segment file).  So question arise:
> 1) does performing a flush has to start a new segment file?
> 2) if so, in order  to  run TestDeletedDocs smoothly either change  writer.SetMaxBufferedDocs(2)
to, say,    writer.SetMaxBufferedDocs(20) or call writer.optimize(1) before closing writer.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message