lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Garski <>
Subject RE: 2.9 Target Framework
Date Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:20:05 GMT
No problem - 2.0 it is.


-----Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [] 
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 7:16 PM
Subject: RE: 2.9 Target Framework

I agree with DIGY.  We have discussed this in the past few times.  We have
to get 2.9.1 out really soon, so we can catch up with 3.0 and do more than
just port over logic from Java to C# -- but also take advantage of what C#
and .NET has to offer.

BTW, those kind of discussions should be on the dev side vs. user.

-- George

-----Original Message-----
From: Digy [] 
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: 2.9 Target Framework

I think we should stick to .NET 2.0 till Lucene 3.0 which can be a good
place to switch to .NET 3.5 (so will Lucene.Java do also).

There are also a lot of places where smarter codes can be used ( replacing
"GetEnumerator+while" with "foreach", implementing a .NET like "Set" instead
of using Hashtable etc.) But it can  be a problem in porting unless we catch
up with Lucene.Java.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Garski [] 
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 7:26 PM
Subject: 2.9 Target Framework

Apologies for the cross-posting to both lists, but I think this issue is
applicable to both.


What is the target framework for Lucene.Net 2.9?  I'm assuming 2.0  but
would like to ensure this is defined.  There are a few cases in some of
the internal implementation where use of LINQ would be handy, such as in
collection transformations to arrays.  Overall, it's not a big deal to
target 2.0 however some of the implementation will be a bit more elegant
and precise if we target 3.5.






Michael Garski

Sr. Search Architect 

310.969.7435 (office)

310.251.6355 (mobile)


View raw message