lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Martz <>
Subject Re: Lucene.NET 2.4.0
Date Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:02:34 GMT
Sigh...I didn't see Digy's previous email which implicitly answers my
question through his implementation, sorry.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Ben Martz <> wrote:

> With regards to the sync issue, I was puzzling over whether or not the java
> sync method actually flushes the underlying disk cache or if it simply
> completes the pending operations within the context of the specific file
> stream (like System.IO.FileStream.Flush()) - I haven't been able to find the
> answer so far. Obviously an actual sync of the underlying cache is a very
> expensive operation that would be nice to avoid if possible, especially if
> all we need to do is flush the pending writes to the file so that a
> concurrent read operation can take place. Can anyone enlighten me perhaps?
> Thanks,
> Ben

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message