lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Digy" <>
Subject RE: TestRemoteSearchable and random port
Date Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:36:11 GMT
Hi Ben,
You are right, but it is still possible to choose a free port rather that a
random port which may be in use.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Martz [] 
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: TestRemoteSearchable and random port


That's what I thought at first as well until I realized that the SetUp
method is explicitly choosing a random port number each time its called. If
it wasn't for the random port numbering I would perhaps suggest an explicit
call to UnregisterChannel.


On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Digy <> wrote:

> Hi TJ,
> You can open an issue on JIRA
> ( and submit your patches.
> But as far as I can see, your patch reduces the probability of a port
> conflict but does not solve the real problem. I think, the real problem
> lies
> in some previously running test cases not closing the ports appropriately.
13:37 - Someone stole the precinct toilet. The cops have nothing to go on.
14:37 - Officers dispatched to a daycare where a three-year-old was
resisting a rest.
21:11 - Hole found in nudist camp wall. Officers are looking into it.

View raw message