juneau-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Bognar <james.bog...@salesforce.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Maven naming conventions
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:22:52 GMT
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 9:22 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:

> Hey,
> Looking at our project, it seems we skip many of the maven norms.  I'd like
> to propose:
> - Directory names match artifact ID's.  E.g. instead of "org.apache.juneau"
> you would have a directory called "juneau-core" which matches the pom's
> artifact ID.


> - We don't have MANIFEST.MF files checked in, instead have proper maven
> configuration so they get generated properly.  This would be in the
> maven-jar-plugin.


> - Files go in the standard directories.  Instead of
> OSGI-INF/I10n/plugin.properties it should be under src/main/resources with
> proper configuration.  This probably means changing the packaging from jar
> to bundle and using the org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin (or whatever
> it might be called these days).  LIkewise, don't rely on a war/web.xml for
> tests, instead use src/test/resources/war/web.xml

The web.xml in the samples bundle is an old artifact.  We used to package
the samples as a war file.  It can be deleted.

> - Test class names should follow standard convention.  I still haven't
> quite figured out what CT stands for, but most projects use "Test" as their
> suffix for test classes.  We may want to categorize, e.g. UnitTest vs
> IntegrationTest.

Agreed.  Let's prefix them with Test*.
CT_* was an old naming convention for Component Tests.

James Bognar

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message