incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lars Francke <>
Subject Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)
Date Fri, 01 Mar 2019 12:59:58 GMT
If only some people are like me they joined to support a specific podling
by giving their +1 on a vote. I did the same, then went silent for a year
or so and am only now starting to get interested in the Incubator workings

Maybe if we could change the requirements on binding votes for podling
proposals we wouldn't need as many people in the IPMC?
As far as I know every member can become IPMC member. So if we change the
rules that every member vote is binding (whether or not they are in the
IPMC) people wouldn't need to join the club.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:50 PM Myrle Krantz <> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:33 AM Justin Mclean <>
> wrote:
> >
> > And most probably do not participate. Would asking for those 100 odd
> > people to be removed come across as friendly?
> >
> I'd be +1 on removing them.  a.) While kindness towards our fellow PMC
> members is important, the role of the Incubator is to be friendly to
> incoming projects. b.) It's not unkind to our fellow PMC members.  They are
> welcome to come back when they're ready.
> But I also don't think it's going to solve anything.  Those people aren't
> contributing to solutions *or* problems.
> Best,
> Myrle

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message