incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <>
Subject Re: Does Zipkin need to sign a SGA ?
Date Mon, 08 Oct 2018 17:40:11 GMT

I was looking at the October report and see that we need to close the loop on this thread.

> On Sep 27, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:29 PM Adrian Cole <> wrote:
>> ...basically I'm sure many of us would like to know where the
>> concerns are and how to address concretely what is of issue...
> As Craig wrote earlier here
>> ..."all that needs to be done" is to establish that all of the copyright owners
>> sign either a Software Grant or an ICLA...
> So ideally all contributors sign a common Software Grant, or in some
> documented way delegate that to someone who is authorized to represent
> "the OpenZipkin community" and sign the software grant.
> As mentioned at INFRA-16989, the alternative is for all contributors
> to sign an Apache iCLA, IIUC Craig correctly in this case a Software
> Grant is not needed.
> From what you say it looks like there's no code from Twitter left in
> the codebase that is to be imported, if that's the case (and again
> provided we have documented declarations that confirm that) my opinion
> is that you don't need to involve Twitter.

I agree. In fact in looking at the Zipkin repository and the referenced: <>

It looks to me that the code is already covered. As such I think that all that is needed to
get the migration unstuck is a comment from on INFRA-16989


> -Bertrand
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message