incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruilong Huo <r...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Date Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:05:03 GMT
Thanks Roman for the verification! We will fix the issue and keep updated
in the community.

Best regards,
Ruilong Huo

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Ruilong Huo <huor@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed.
> We
> > kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release.
> >
> > The PPMC vote thread is located here:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a7c780cf5655679fa5c0cbe5a8d247
> 77cd0439601266260859f935ef@%3Cdev.hawq.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hawq/2.2.0.
> 0-incubating.RC2/
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key: 1B8B6872.
> >
> > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion =
> > 2.2.0.0-incubating'. You can view them here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12318826&version=12339641
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1, accept as the official Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release
> > [ ] -1, do not accept as the official Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating
> > release because...
> > The vote will run for at least 72 hours.
>
> I do apologize for a delay -- I should've provided this feedback last
> feedback
> last week, but it seems I'll be voting:
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> on the binary portion of this releases. Here's why:
>     1. The deal breaker issue is a total lack of clear IP attribution in
>      binary artifacts. There's no proper LICENSE, NOTICE and
>      DISCLAIMER file in neither the x86 binary package of HAWQ
>      nor in the JAVA packages of companion components. This
>      need to be fixed as per:
>          http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
>          http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html#notes
>      Note that you HAVE to account to all the dependencies you're
>      bundling in a binary release which means your LICENSE and
>      NOTICE files will likely get bigger. For Java side of HAWQ
>      Apache Geode offers a good place to look for how to deal with
>      those files in a binary distribution.
>
>      2. This is one is less of a deal deal breaker for the first release,
> but
>      will be so for subsequent ones: you really shouldn't be shipping
>      apache-tomcat package. For one, you already have a dependency
>      on bigtop-tomcat in hawq-ranger-plugin which means shipping
>      apache-tomcat is wasteful, could conflicting with distribution RPM
>      names and frankly looks a bit sloppy coming from the same project.
>
>      3. This is even less of a dealbreaker than #2, but it may help you
>      simplify solving for #1: I don't think you need to ship all those
>      extra dependencies in hawq-ranger-plugin -- a much better option
>      is getting them from a classpath just like other Java packages of
>      HAWQ do.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message