incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2016 23:51:48 GMT
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Why? It would be perfectly fine for PG project to include, lets say an MIT
>> source code.
>
> That would be compatible with our license. But what if they included GPL or CDDL licensed
software?

There's NO WAY that could be the case for the files we're discussing.
We know that. Other
files that your scan identified is not part of this discussion. This
discussion is about properly
importing unmodified 3d party code originally available under
PostgreSQL license.

I can not see how a project available under PostgreSQL license could
legally include GPL code
for example, so this particular point in context of this particular
discussion is moot. Lets move on.

>> That's why I don't feel comfortable putting the overall PG  licensed header there
on my own.
>
> Nor should you if the files are not licensed that way.

Good. We agree then.

>> I think we're talking slightly past each other -- I told you I do KNOW that they
>> are licensed under the different ALv2 compatible license.
>
> The package as a whole is licensed that way. But you stated you didn’t not know how
that file is licensed it may
> be ALv2 or it may be something else.

Correct. All I know is that it is an ALv2 compatible license.

Thanks,
Roman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message