incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3
Date Wed, 02 Mar 2016 07:15:58 GMT

On 3/1/16, 5:22 PM, "Todd Lipcon" <> wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Justin Mclean <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> > I seem to recall reading some place or another that pointers
>> > to licenses in the forms of URLs or textual references are frowned
>> > because licenses may change over time, or the links may break
>> Correct. Also most licenses say you much include the full text of the
>> license in your distribution.
>OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing:
>src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib)
>src/kudu/util (some portions): 3-clause BSD license
>src/kudu/util (HdrHistogram-related classes): public domain
>src/kudu/util/{},{random.h}: some portions adapted from
>WebRTC project (modules/video_coding/main/test/ under a
>3-clause BSD license.
>  For full license text of the above licenses, please refer to the license
>headers at the top of the respective files.
>...and then make sure that those files contain the full text of the
>license, instead of copy-pasting the text into LICENSE.txt. Does that
>like the best path forward?

I haven't been following carefully, but isn't there a BSD header in these
files?  If so, couldn't your LICENSE refer people to the headers in those


View raw message