incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hitesh Shah <>
Subject Re: Some questions regarding License/Notice file for a binary distribution ( convenience artifacts )
Date Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:21:54 GMT
Thanks for the helpful pointers and a good starting point, Justin and Amareshwari. 

— Hitesh

On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Justin Mclean <> wrote:

> Hi,
>>  - jetty-6.1.x-jar and jetty-utils-6.1.jar - jetty is Apache License v2 but has some
bits in the Notice file (
) that I would like to understand whether I should call out in either the License and/or Notice
> Just take the bits mentioned that are actually bundled into your release artefact and
add those to NOTICE. [1] You can, but there no need, to add to LICENSE. [2] This probably
mean looking inside the jars and seeing what you’re bundlling. I would be concerned about
"jboss integration module”(LGPL) but I assume that is not being bundled.
>>  - jersey-client, jersey-core,jersey-* jars - these have a dual license - CDDL and
GPLv2 with Classpath Exception. I did not see any wording that stated that the jar could be
used under either license.
> Anything that is dual licensed you get to select the license, CDDL is a weak copyleft
license and should be treated as per [3]. IMO you would add this to LICENSE including where
to get the source. NOTICE should be kept as minimal as possible.
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message