incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <>
Subject Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment
Date Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:49:04 GMT
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
<> wrote:
> It's not unfair. I deliberately tried to say i don't want to distract from the handover

I though we all agreed that whatever pTLP is -- it is absolutely 100%
orthogonal to
the process that Incubator is in business of managing. There will be
some overlap
of people involved in both, but we don't need to wait on Incubator to
proceed with
pTLP any more than we'd need to wait on Incubator to do something in Hadoop land
(although quite a few Hadoop folks are on IPMC).

> I don't think its productive to make someone's support or otherwise of an experiment
> to distract from getting the right chair to replace you.

That would be a fair point if we didn't try as hard as we can to
decouple the two.

If what you're saying is: currently there's no way for Incubator NOT
to be involved
in pTLP AND if that's the opinion shared by the majority on the board,
I'd have to
re-evaluate things on my end.

I thought Greg convinced you all that it must be de-coupled. That's what I based
my calculations on.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message