incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nalley <>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow
Date Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:58:29 GMT
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
<> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Nalley <>
> Reply-To: "" <>
> Date: Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:34 AM
> To: "" <>
> Cc: Shoaib Sufi <>
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow
> [..snip..]
>>I see two paragraphs here that don't answer the question posed. Where
>>will plugin development happen in an ideal world?
> This is an implementation detail and can be dealt with during Incubation?
>>One followup question - what kind of build/CI resources does the
>>University of Manchester provide? What manner of resources do you
>>believe you'll need if the project moves to the ASF?
> Is it a requirement for projects to provide build/CI resources
> now to enter the Incubator? I do not believe that it is.

Not trying to obligate them to provide any resources, merely trying to
get an idea how it will affect the Foundation's resources and trying
to plan ahead. The migration of 85 github repos alone will, depending,
on complexity, likely consume 1-3 contractor days worth of work. If
large CI needs exist, it's best to at least know them up front so we
can begin planning. Adding a podling has an inherent cost, and some
podlings cost more than others; I'm trying to understand what that
will be so it isn't a surprise down the road.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message