incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" <>
Subject RE: [Proposal] Taverna workflow
Date Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:46:05 GMT
It's a requirement for the ASF to support its projects. Understanding what impact each project
coming into the incubator might have is important to allow VP Infra to plan for our growth.
David did not ask if Manchester will be donating resources, he asked what do they currently
provide and what does the project think they will need from the ASF.

For the record, I am familiar with Taverna from a previous life. It's is interesting to see
this proposal coming to the ASF.  The first time this was discussed with the University of
Manchester was many years ago. The conversation occurred every couple of years, each time
with different people, but never progressed to a proposal. Given the answers in this thread
things have changed quite considerably since then.

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)<>
Sent: ‎9/‎25/‎2014 10:09 AM
Cc: Shoaib Sufi<>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

Hi Guys,

-----Original Message-----
From: David Nalley <>
Reply-To: "" <>
Date: Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:34 AM
To: "" <>
Cc: Shoaib Sufi <>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

>I see two paragraphs here that don't answer the question posed. Where
>will plugin development happen in an ideal world?

This is an implementation detail and can be dealt with during Incubation?

>One followup question - what kind of build/CI resources does the
>University of Manchester provide? What manner of resources do you
>believe you'll need if the project moves to the ASF?

Is it a requirement for projects to provide build/CI resources
now to enter the Incubator? I do not believe that it is.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message