incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <>
Subject Re: Retired podlings - should SVN trees be moved under a RETIRED subtree?
Date Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:43:56 GMT

On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:39 AM, sebb wrote:

> I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled
> because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then
> authorization.
> However it now occurs to me that it might be easier to navigate the
> incubator svn tree if the retired podling svn trees were moved under
> incubator/RETIRED instead.
> i.e.
> incubator/alois=> incubator/RETIRED/alois
> This would have some advantages:
> - the top-level incubator/ tree would only show current podlings (and
> lazy graduates!).


> - it would be obvious which SVN trees were retired without needing to
> open the sub-tree


> - it might make it simpler to set up the correct svn mailer/auth permissions

I don't have an opinion on this.
> The main disadvantage that I can see is that the SVN URL in the status
> file would be incorrect. This could of course be corrected.

I think this is a fair tradeoff against the benefits above.

> Thoughts?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
408 276-5638
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message