incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <>
Subject Re: Licence headers in template files
Date Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:30:46 GMT
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Douma <> wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
>> <>  wrote:
>>> I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this
>>> page), but the release FAQ [1] makes it sound like you need the header, if
>>> you assume your templates are source:
>>>       Which Files Must Contain An ASF License Text?
>>>       Every source file must contain the appropriate ASF License text.
>>> I am no lawyer, so I will defer to someone who has more experience than
>>> me to help you determine whether your snippets count as source.
>> I think that is a bug in the Release FAQ. What i've been told in the
>> past but which i can't find links to right now, is that the top level
>> LICENSE file covers everything anyway and the individual license
>> headers aren't strictly necessary especially for source files without
>> significant IP.
> Really? That then would be quite some 'bug' IMO.
> I can't recall have heard it said like this before, instead confirmation of
> the above rule quite often. Exceptions (no headers) only being allowed for
> sources without real IP value.
> Ate
>> IMHO if the headers are problematic for Wookie in
>> those files then it would be ok to just not include the header.
>>    ...ant

I've just asked for clarification about this over at legal -


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message