incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Williams <>
Subject Role of Incubator PMC Votes
Date Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:30:11 GMT
I'm watching the "renaming" vote thread and I find it odd that folks
are -1-ing the project's vote.  I've read the role of the IPMC[1] and
the policy[2] and can't find the basis for our (IPMC) doing anything
other than ack-ing they're vote.  It seems like votes from the IPMC
should only be relevant/binding when the matter in question is
release/legal/trademark/etc-type issues that could [legally] effect
the foundation.  I dunno, this seems purely a project matter to me
(like a logo, code, etc.) - second-guessing a project team on these
sort of subjective things seems counter-productive to grooming
self-sustaining projects to me.  So, is this normal - why does the
IPMC really get anything more than an "advising" role in these sorts
of matters (and why is that healthy)?


[1] -
[2] -

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message