incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tobias Schlitt <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Zeta Components
Date Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:52:22 GMT
Hash: SHA1

On 04/20/2010 02:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> would it be problematic if issue tracking / CI would be hosted on a
>> dedicated server outside Apache? Kore Nordmann and me would happily
>> sponsor this server.

> I am not a decision maker, but I would think that CI is no problem. I
> mean, it uses code from Apache SVN and there is no documentation which
> is cirtical for the project on it. If it breaks or gets lost or
> developers leave the project there is nearly no harm done because one
> can set up another CI server. In Log4PHP we had a cruisecontrol server
> from one of the developers until we moved to buildbot. I think we
> could have stayed there.

> On issues i think is more problematic. This is information critical to
> a project and I believe it needs to be stored somewhere on Apache
> servers. But there is always the chance to speak with infra if we are
> able to install Arbit there. Is this a incubation blocker for Zeta? If
> not we should proceed with this process and then ask infra, otherwise
> we need to clarify now.

I don't think this should be an incubation blocker, although some of us
have really strong feelings against Jira and even stronger against
Bugzilla. Therefore, if we can sort out this stuff before, it's good. :)

- -- 
Tobias Schlitt       GPG Key: 0xC462BC14
a passion for php           
Member of the eZ Components project
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message