incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tobias Schlitt <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Zeta Components
Date Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:34:44 GMT
Hash: SHA1


On 04/20/2010 01:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> I think the complete project should be hosted on apache servers

>> Is it possible to use Arbit instead of the standard issue trackers
>> provided by Apache?

> Currently only bugzilla and jira is used in apache world. The use of
> Arbit needs to be discussed with the infra team. I am not sure if this
> will happen so easily
> For integration, there are several continuus integration server
> around. Its cruise control, buildbot (Log4PHP uses buildbot for
> example) and i think Gump around. Other might exist but I am not sure.
> Again, if someelse is necessary this is a dicussion with infra team

would it be problematic if issue tracking / CI would be hosted on a
dedicated server outside Apache? Kore Nordmann and me would happily
sponsor this server.

The reasons we want to use Arbit instead of the other solutions is simple:

1. Since Arbit is driven by some of the core contributors of Zeta, we
can patch new features into it right away, as we need them.

2. Arbit is built upon Zeta Components and eating our own dog food is
just fair.

3. We have experience with other CI solutions (CruiseControl) and it's
always been a hassle to fully integrate the metrics we wanted to have.

4. CI of Zeta consumes quite some ressources. 1-2 GB of RAM consumption
is not seldom. A dedicated server for this purpose would ensure we do
not disturb other services.

- -- 
Tobias Schlitt       GPG Key: 0xC462BC14
a passion for php           
Member of the eZ Components project
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message