incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Wechner <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS)
Date Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:49:44 GMT
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Michael Wechner
> <> wrote:
>> Right and as long as OpenCMIS fulfills the requirements of the incubator I
>> don't see any reason why there shouldn't be two projects of the same topic.
>> I also do not see any reason why OpenCMIS should be a sub-project of
>> Chemistry.
>> Give it a chance of its own within the current rules of the incubator and it
>> will either work or not.
>> If it works, then graduate, if not, then remove it.
> My concern is that if there are two separate svn trees then factoring
> things between the two projects will be much harder. Let's not kid
> ourselves, having two different maven release cycles, and having
> dependencies to foreign SNAPSHOT projects, will not help. To me it's a
> waste of time and effort.
> Let me ask the question differently: what's lost by having the code in
> the Chemistry svn tree?

Beside that I agree with Joe's email I would additionally argue that you 
can easily share code without being
within the same project and having it separate from each other it forces 
you to make
the architecture/code even better,  which I think has (nearly) only 


> Florent

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message