incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sanjiva Weerawarana <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Stonehenge
Date Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:27:04 GMT
Paul Fremantle wrote:
>> the scope's really pretty broad so i think a little more detail about
>> scaling out would be useful: how would stonehenge approach adding new
>> suites especially when donated from outside the developers group?
> I guess I imagined that there would be two approaches. One is that
> someone might develop this outside of Stonehenge and then do a grant.
> However, I would expect a more likely approach is that someone would
> contribute via the normal JIRA / patch process. Do you see any issues
> with either of these?

I actually expect that the way a true community will form around this 
project is when the next application is something that is born out of 
Stonehenge itself .. that is, someone proposes an idea and then we discuss 
it, refine it, develop an architecture, document it and implement it in 17 
different ways. In that case there could be external contribs and 
JIRA/patch contribs too but most would be by project committers directly 
writing the code.

Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation;
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;
Member; Apache Software Foundation;
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa;


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message