incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thilo Goetz <>
Subject Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings
Date Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:44:41 GMT
sebb wrote:
> On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <> wrote:
>> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>>>> Indeed, but see also:
>>>>> These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of
>>>>> Commons.
>>>> Yes, and they don't work for us, as I pointed out earlier.
>>>> There are also settings in there that I find rather doubtful.  What
>>>> is the point of having eol-style for .bat files set to native?
>>> So a unix person can edit it without leaving lines that don't have the
>> cr/lf (or have to see ^M marks all over the place).   I do all kinds of
>> edits to bat files from my Linux box.  However, if they get committed with
>> "mixed" styles, some versions of windows complain loudly when you try to run
>> them.
>>  Ok, I'll take your word for it ;-)
>>  So how do you handle releases, as I asked in a different mail
>>  in this thread?  If you now extract the code on unix, you have
>>  .bat files with unix eol chars.  I don't think the windows shell
>>  handles that.  Same for .sh files, just the other way around.
>>  I'm sure people have a solution for that, but I don't see it.
> use eol-style: LF for .sh and CRLF for .bat/.cmd

Right, that's what we're doing.  Dan on the other hand is
recommending using eol-style:native, because he wants to
edit .bat files on unix.  And this is also the setting in
svn config that you pointed to above, btw.  We may have
entered a loop here, not quite sure yet.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message