incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Newcomer, Eric" <>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Policy on Initial Committership
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:58:07 GMT

It seems like there's clear consensus now around this question of the
initial committers list.  Thanks to everyone for joining the debate.  

A couple of things stand out to me from this: it is important to follow
the process and treat approval of a proposal in terms of the agreement
it represents (and carry it out accordingly) and that as Roy said
although it may take some time in the end the right thing will happen. 

Can we please ensure that everyone on the committers list for CXF is now
given appropriate status?



-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Jagielski [] 
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Policy on Initial Committership

Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Mentors have NO RIGHT and NO RESPONSIBILITY to make
> decisions on behalf of a project as if they owned the project. The
> Mentors are only there to help the project govern itself and, in
> some cases, be counted as one of the people on the PPMC.

++1. And I certainly did not act in that way, and, in fact
tried to prevent any such thing from happening. 
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [|]
	    "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message