incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Endre Stølsvik <>
Subject Re: Release Requirements
Date Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:03:28 GMT
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Endre Stølsvik wrote:
>> My two (probably rather worthless) cents:
> Not at all worthless.  What you posted is perfectly valid feedback, and
> should be considered by projects.  But does it rise to the standard of
> needing to be enforced?

In my opinion, yes.

This is because if not, every project might insist that "their packaging 
is better", or just not think about it, and thus not follow the defacto 
standard, if there is such a thing.

Why are there such differences now, then?

This is, if one would go for such an approach, a top-level decision that 
shouldn't be up to the projects to decide - you're "apache compliant" 
only if you follow this packaging. And it really isn't a big enforcement 
either, it's just that it should be crammed in from the get-go, so that 
the projects do think about it, and started out in line with the rest.

Note that I do not in any way suggest that the entire layout of the 
system, nor the build system (!!) or similar should be enforced, just 
the end-packaging for the "bins" (which really is what (most) people 
download - they want "the working stuff", the open source aspect is in 
this regard just a potential tailorability and important safety (and 
hopefully quality) sign).


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message